← Back to Insights

Open-Source AI Ecosystem: Part 4 - Model Deployment and Inference Infrastructure

11/23/2025 · 6 min read

← Part 3: RAG Frameworks and Agent Orchestration | Part 4 of 5 | Part 5: Evaluation, Guardrails, and Production Safety →

Introduction

The transition from model development to production deployment introduces distinct technical challenges: optimizing inference latency, managing computational resources, and ensuring service reliability at scale. This part examines inference servers, deployment frameworks, and serving architectures that enable production-grade AI systems.

This is Part 4 of a 5-part series on the open-source AI ecosystem. Building on the application frameworks covered in Part 3, we now examine the infrastructure layer that brings these systems to production at scale.

1. High-Performance Inference Servers

Inference servers optimize the deployment and execution of large language models, focusing on throughput, latency, and resource efficiency [63][69].

vLLM

vLLM, developed at UC Berkeley, introduces PagedAttention, a memory management technique that addresses the inefficiency of traditional reservation-based allocators [63][69]. Traditional systems reserve contiguous GPU memory for the maximum possible sequence length, resulting in 60-80 percent memory waste when actual sequences are shorter [69].

PagedAttention implements dynamic memory allocation, reducing waste to under 4 percent [69]. Additional optimizations include:

  • Continuous Batching: Dynamically adjusts batch composition as requests complete, maximizing GPU utilization [63].
  • Distributed Inference: Support for multi-GPU deployment [63].
  • Cloud-Agnostic Design: Hardware platform flexibility [63].

Benchmark comparisons indicate vLLM achieves superior throughput at high concurrency (100 users), reaching 4741.62 tokens/second compared to TensorRT-LLM's 1942.64 tokens/second [69]. vLLM also consistently delivers the fastest Time-to-First-Token (TTFT) in high-concurrency scenarios [69].

NVIDIA Triton Inference Server

Triton provides an enterprise-grade serving platform supporting multiple frameworks including PyTorch, TensorFlow, ONNX, and custom backends [63][66]. Key capabilities include:

  • Model Ensemble: Pipeline parallelism enabling multi-model workflows [63].
  • Framework Agnosticism: Deploy models from virtually any framework [63].
  • MLPerf Validated Performance: Achieved virtually identical performance to bare-metal submission on Llama 2 70B benchmark [66][69].

Triton with TensorRT-LLM backend excels at single-request throughput (242.79 tokens/second at 1 user), indicating superior raw compute for individual requests [69]. The platform is optimal for organizations with NVIDIA-centric infrastructure requiring diverse model deployment at scale [63].

Selection Guidance

ScenarioRecommended SolutionRationale
High-concurrency chatbotvLLM StandaloneBest TTFT and throughput scaling at high concurrency
Offline batch processingTriton + TensorRT-LLMOptimal single-request latency and batch compute
Multi-framework deploymentTritonFramework-agnostic serving
Rapid prototypingvLLMSimpler setup, Hugging Face integration

Source: Comparative benchmark analyses [63][69][75].

2. Model Serving Frameworks

Beyond inference engines, model serving frameworks provide APIs, monitoring, and deployment automation for production systems [100][110].

FastAPI with Hugging Face

FastAPI provides a high-performance web framework for building HTTP APIs that integrate with language models [100][103]. The combination enables:

  • Endpoint-based infrastructure receiving text prompts and returning generated responses [100].
  • Asynchronous operation handling through Uvicorn ASGI server [100].
  • Integration with Hugging Face Inference API for accessing hosted models [100].

This approach is optimal for prototyping and moderate-scale production deployments where simplicity outweighs the need for advanced optimization [100][103].

BentoML

BentoML provides a Python-based utility for packaging and deploying models as microservices [110][113]. Key features include:

  • Unified model packaging format for online and offline serving [110].
  • Micro-batching mechanism delivering up to 100x throughput improvement over Flask-based servers [110].
  • Docker-native deployment with CI/CD pipeline integration [110].
  • Support for TensorFlow, PyTorch, Scikit-learn, and additional frameworks [110].

BentoML requires implementing model loading and inference methods, offering flexibility at the cost of additional development effort [113]. The framework is well-suited for microservice-based ML deployment in organizations without dedicated infrastructure teams [110].

Ray Serve

Ray Serve provides distributed model serving built on the Ray framework for parallel computing [110][119]. Capabilities include:

  • Horizontal scaling across clusters [110].
  • Multi-model and pipeline serving [110].
  • Integration with Ray ecosystem (RLlib for reinforcement learning, Tune for hyperparameter optimization) [110].

Ray Serve is optimal for distributed applications requiring flexible scaling and organizations already invested in the Ray ecosystem [110][119].

3. MLOps and Model Management Platforms

Production machine learning requires infrastructure for experiment tracking, model versioning, and deployment automation [23][26].

MLflow

MLflow provides an open-source platform for managing the machine learning lifecycle [26][32]. Components include:

  • MLflow Tracking: Records parameters, metrics, and artifacts from experiments [26].
  • MLflow Projects: Packages code, dependencies, and configurations for reproducibility [26].
  • MLflow Models: Manages storage, versioning, and deployment of trained models [26].
  • Model Registry: Maintains version control and tracks lineage from development to production [26].

MLflow supports diverse deployment targets including Docker, cloud services, and REST APIs [26]. The platform is framework-agnostic, working with PyTorch, TensorFlow, Scikit-learn, and additional libraries [26][41].

Kubeflow

Kubeflow provides a Kubernetes-native platform for end-to-end ML orchestration [23][26]. Key components include:

  • Kubeflow Pipelines: Creates and executes ML workflows as directed acyclic graphs [26].
  • KFServing: Deploys models as scalable, serverless microservices [26].
  • Katib: Provides automated hyperparameter tuning with multiple optimization algorithms [26].

Kubeflow is optimal for organizations with cloud-native infrastructure and Kubernetes expertise requiring scalable ML workload management [23][26].

Comparative Analysis

FeatureMLflowKubeflow
Primary PurposeLifecycle management, tracking, deploymentEnd-to-end MLOps on Kubernetes
Pipeline ManagementIntegrates with Airflow, Prefect, ZenMLNative Kubeflow Pipelines
Model ServingREST API, Docker, cloud platformsKFServing on Kubernetes
Learning CurveModerateSteep (requires Kubernetes expertise)
Best ForFramework-agnostic experiment trackingKubernetes-native scalable ML

Source: Platform comparisons [23][26][35].

4. Data Version Control

DVC (Data Version Control) addresses the challenge of versioning large datasets and model artifacts that cannot be efficiently managed by Git [102][108].

Core capabilities include:

  • Version your data and models: Store artifacts in cloud storage while keeping version information in Git [108].
  • Lightweight pipelines: Run only steps impacted by changes, reducing iteration time [108].
  • Experiment tracking: Track experiments in local Git repositories without external servers [108][105].
  • Compare and share: Compare data, code, parameters, models, and performance plots across experiments [108].

DVC integrates with CI/CD pipelines through services including GitLab CI, GitHub Actions, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps [111]. The tool enables automated testing and continuous improvement of model quality through versioned experiments [111].

References

[23] https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/machine-learning/best-model-management-tools-in-mlops/

[26] https://www.guvi.in/blog/kubeflow-vs-mlflow/

[32] https://mlflow.org

[35] https://www.zenml.io/blog/kubeflow-vs-mlflow

[41] https://neptune.ai/blog/best-open-source-mlops-tools

[63] https://www.inferless.com/learn/vllm-vs-triton-inference-server-choosing-the-best-inference-library-for-large-language-models

[66] https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-triton-inference-server-achieves-outstanding-performance-in-mlperf-inference-4-1-benchmark

[69] https://uplatz.com/blog/token-efficient-inference-a-comparative-systems-analysis-of-vllm-and-nvidia-triton-serving-architectures

[75] https://sider.ai/blog/ai-tools/triton-inference-server-vs-vllm-the-platform-trade-off-behind-ai-deployment

[100] https://machinelearningmastery.com/building-llm-applications-with-hugging-face-endpoints-and-fastapi/

[102] https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/track-your-ml-experiments-end-to-end-with-data-version-control-and-amazon-sagemaker/

[103] https://www.kdnuggets.com/a-simple-to-implement-end-to-end-project-with-huggingface

[105] https://dvc.org/blog/ml-experiment-versioning

[108] https://github.com/iterative/dvc

[110] https://www.devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-ai-model-serving-frameworks-tools-in-2025-features-pros-cons-comparison/

[111] https://www.dasca.org/world-of-data-science/article/effortless-data-and-model-versioning-with-dvc

[113] https://neptune.ai/blog/ml-model-serving-best-tools

[119] https://www.truefoundry.com/blog/model-deployment-tools

This is Part 4 of a 5-part series